Łukasz Grajewski
Krzysztof Nieczypor
Anna Woźniak
Liza Frank
Paweł Charkiewicz
Artur Kacprzak
Tomasz Horbowski
Halyna Budivska
Evgeniy Voropay
Adrienne Warren
Ketevan Kantaria
Karolina Demus
Ana Dabrundashvili
Tomasz Piechal
Paweł Purski
Maryia Aukhimovich
Konstanty Chodkowski
Beka Chedia
Joanna Koziol
Marcin Prengowski
Magdalena Swoboda
Marina Brutyan
Arzu Geybulla
Evgenija Markaryan
Yulia Lyshenko
Paweł Lickiewicz
Tomasz Kobylański
Vyacheslav Dianov
Katarzyna Wróbel
Matteo Cazzulani
Тексти.org.ua
Paweł Zalewski
Marta Kacwin
Svitlana Ilchenko
Nikolai Holmov
Olga
Wojciech Jakóbik
Krzysztof Łątka
Roman Kravets
Alisa Fluhrer

Ukraine: Twist in Web War

Read this article in other languages: ru pl

 

Hackers won with the government as media reported after Ministry of Internal Affairs – in response to web attacks against governmental sites – unblocked access to the popular file sharing service ex.au. Some are of opinion that in fact authorities are behind the commotion over the portal.

Logo serwisu Ex.ua, źródło: www.tokarskiyura.com

Ex.ua logo, source: tokarskiyura.com

On 31 January, Ukrainian militsiya closed ex.au, a popular Ukrainian portal, on the grounds of illegal distribution of files and computer programmes. Internet users stroked back and paralyzed websites of governmental institutions. This scenario resembles the shutdown of Megaupload, a file hosting service, in the US. But here the similarities end.

Shortly afterwards, highly placed politicians in governmental structures came to defence of the service, i.e. Nina Karpachova, member of Party of Regions and the government’s human rights ombudswoman, and Alexander Yanukovych, son of the President. After three days since the shutdown of the service, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVS) informed on unblocking the service. This sudden “rise from the dead” brings up questions about why authorities, who had not bowed to international pressure in relation to Yulia Tymoshenko’s case, or from a massive crowd protesting against the pension reform, decided to back down this time.

According to a high-ranking civil servant of Ukrainian MVS whom Zerkalo Nedeli weekly interviewed, closing ex.au was a political gesture of Kiev towards Washington. Right before the shutdown, Ukrainian Minister of Finance Valeriy Khoroshkovsky paid a visit to Washington, with a goal of obtaining a credit from the International Monetary Fund. “If the militsiya had wanted to close the black market offering pirated content, it would have done it a long time ago, along with the Petrivka market (one of the biggest markets in Ukraine with books and record – author’s note)”.

The weekly’s source revealed the reasons for unblocking the service: “This time we can say that for MVS the protests and attacking governmental websites became an excellent excuse to listen to society’s opinion and to unblock the website”. Ukrainska Pravda, while conducting its own investigation, wrote that so far the owner of the hosting service remains unknown, and actions of authorities are similar to a “good cop, bad cop” technique, used to divert citizens’ attention. As for the cause of such behaviour Viktor Levandovsky, leader of Association for Internet Space Development in Ukraine, has no doubts: “Frequently, on the pretext of fighting against piracy, authorities launch raids on companies to take them over. The ex.au case was about replacing the owner of the service”.

Another version – a personal intervention of the Fuhrer:

Source: Zerkalo Nedeli [1], [2], Ukrainska Pravda [1], [2], [3], [4], Bussiness New EuropeDeutsche Welle

Translated by KD

 
  • Facebook
  • LiveJournal
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Reader
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • Share

 

Tags: , , , , ,

1. The published comments are private opinions of the users. Eastbook.eu does not take responsibility for the contents of the opinions.

2. Eastbook.eu editorial staff reserves the right to delete a comment in the following situations:

  1. The comment contains vulgar language.
  2. The comment offends other nationalities or religions, or incites to racial hatred.
  3. The comment is FUD
  4. The comment is offensive to the author of the publication, other commenting users or any other person.
  5. The comment aims at escalating a conflict between the commenting persons.
  6. The comment is SPAM, an advertisement or a link to infringing websites.

3. Triple contravention of the rules listed in point 2 results in a one-month ban.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Facebook
Subscribe to Eastletter Become an author
 



 


Recent comments